Search for: "Mipo Science "
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 3:41 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited (“Mipo Tech”); Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:25 pm
., Ltd. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holding Limited of Hong Kong as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:49 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited (“Mipo Tech”); Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm
., Ltd. of Taiwan, Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a/ Mipo America, Ltd. of Miami, Florida, and SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a/ All Colors of Miami, Florida as the Respondents in this investigation. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm
., Ltd. of Taiwan, Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the United States, sell for importation, and/or sell within the United States after importation certain inkjet ink cartridges with… [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:21 pm
., Ltd. of Taiwan (“MicroJet”), Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan (“APM”), Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (“PTC”) (collectively “proposed respondents”), have engaged in violations of Section 337 through… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
(“APM”); Mipo Technology Limited; Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd.; SinoTime Technologies, Inc.; and PTC Holdings Limited (“PTC”) of infringing certain claims of U.S Patent Nos. 6,234,598; 6,309,053; 6,398,347; 6,412,917; 6,481,817; 6,402,279; and 6,412,917. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
No. 337-TA-615 (ITC 337 Update) Hewlett-Packard – Initial determination terminates Mipo International Ltd. and Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd. from Inv. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc v Folgers… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(Intellogist) Australia FCA: ‘To authorise’ has the same meaning for patents and copyright: Inverness Medical Switzerland GmBH v MDS Diagnostics Pty Ltd (IP Whiteboard) Brazil Brazil looking forward to increase creation by innovation and technology - MOU on Cooperation of Science, Technology and Innovation (IP tango) Canada FCC allows opposition to VIBETRAIN registration: Vibe Media Group LLC v Lewis Craig t/a VIBETRAIN (Canadian Trademark Blog) Federal… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc v Folgers… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Only until their corporate clients find out (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Discussion of The Hill op-ed by Sen Hatch ‘1952 law belies out progress in sciences’ (IP Watchdog) Ocean Tomo does rating deal with France’s state bank (IAM) Did you know... importation is a separate requirement in section 337 cases? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP finance) (IP finance) Why licensing negotiations fail (Innovationpartners) Global - Patents Patent reality check: Litigation not a viable revenue source for most inventors (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Dow and Fuji Xerox join Eco-Patent Commons; scheme needs more commitment if it is ever to be a success (Managing IP) (IAM) The coming explosion of the patent monetization market: Brought to you by Open Innovation and what needs to happen in order to speed up the process (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
